WotR: Making Nuclear Sharing Credible Again: What the F-35A Means for NATO
WotR: Making Nuclear Sharing Credible Again: What the F-35A Means for NATO
Critics and supporters of NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture, which relies partly on forward-deployed U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe, hardly agree on anything. But when it comes to nuclear sharing, their assessments are remarkably similar. Both groups claim, either explicitly or implicitly, that American B-61 gravity bombs and the nuclear sharing arrangement as a whole are militarily obsolete and lack credibility. However, participants in the ongoing debate about the future of NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture have failed to realize that the technological and political nature of nuclear sharing is changing. The F-35A Lightning II, which is set to replace current legacy
The post Making Nuclear Sharing Credible Again: What the F-35A Means for NATO appeared first on War on the Rocks.
Les mer...
Critics and supporters of NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture, which relies partly on forward-deployed U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe, hardly agree on anything. But when it comes to nuclear sharing, their assessments are remarkably similar. Both groups claim, either explicitly or implicitly, that American B-61 gravity bombs and the nuclear sharing arrangement as a whole are militarily obsolete and lack credibility. However, participants in the ongoing debate about the future of NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture have failed to realize that the technological and political nature of nuclear sharing is changing. The F-35A Lightning II, which is set to replace current legacy
The post Making Nuclear Sharing Credible Again: What the F-35A Means for NATO appeared first on War on the Rocks.
Les mer...